Subject: Are US CEOs overpaid?
A Chief Executive Officer (CEO) “is
the highest ranking executive in a company…[who] manages the overall operations
and resources of a company…acts as the main point of communication between the
board of directors and the corporate operations” (A). While a plethora of US companies are
underperforming, it appears that the CEOs are continuing to receive inflated
salaries and generous bonuses. When
analyzing the performance of organizations in the United States and when broadening
our scope to the salary of the worldwide CEO, it is becoming increasingly more
difficult to defend that the US CEO is solely responsible or entitled to the
wealth he/she receives.
There is quite a difference
between and individual who merely runs a company and an individual who built
his/her company from the ground up.
Ralph Lauren is a visionary who took his ideas and transformed them into
a multi million- dollar organization. Lauren believes that “it is not a race for
what is next, rather, an appreciation of what has come before”, (B) instead of
constantly looking ahead and wanting more he takes time to honor his
predecessors and learn about what he needs to do to take the next step in his
company. His $66.7 million salary is
well deserved due to his passion and dedication to the fashion industry and the
24,000 workers he employs worldwide (C). Also, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison and Viacom CEO
Philippe Dauman both earn over $30 million a year but shares in both companies
have increased by over 60% in the last five years under the command of these
gentleman (D). The CEO deserves to be
rewarded for the success of his/her company.
When comparing the salaries and
packages of the US CEO with those in other countries and evaluating who
actually owns the organization, the wages of US CEOs do not seem just. When Japan disclosed the average CEO salary
for companies listed on their stock exchange in 2009, including bonuses, the
total averaged $580,000, “about 16 times more than the typical Japanese worker”
(E). The average US CEO in 2009 made
$3.5 million dollars, “319 times as much as the average American worker” (E). There is no excuse for a margin this large. Also, in 2011 the top US CEOs “got a
collective pay raise of 16%” compared to “a 3% pay raise to the average
American worker” (F).
An agreement of some sort is not only desperately needed but is
essential if we want to please both the CEO and the average working class
American. Therefore, a binding say on
pay mandate will be crucial to the issue at hand. In the United States, shareholders have a
non-binding vote on executive compensation.
Seeing as the board of directors is closely affiliated with the CEO, if
the CEO demands a higher salary or greater bonuses, a non-binding mandate will
hold little to no weight. In Australia,
under a 2011 Amendment to the Corporations act of 2001, “if at two meetings
over 25% of shareholders vote against the directors’ remuneration package, …the
company must convene a general meeting within 90 days in which all the
directors in office at the time must stand down, but may stand for re-election”
(G). A mandate like this can definitely
gain agreement from parties on both sides of the argument. For one, working class Americans can feel
more empowered because they now have an actual say in who stays in office and
how much compensation he/she really deserves.
On the other hand, CEOs will benefit because they have clearer
obligations; continuously increase the value of the company and please the shareholders, this will ensure their spot in the organization and
certainly entitle a pay raise.
Works Cited
(A)"Chief Executive
Officer - CEO." Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Definition.
N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Feb. 2013.
<http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/ceo.asp>.
(B) "Billionaire from the Bronx: How
Ralph Lauren Achieved Success."EvanCarmichael.com. N.p., n.d. Web.
08 Feb. 2013. <http://www.evancarmichael.com/Famous-Entrepreneurs/1895/Billionaire-from-the-Bronx-How-Ralph-Lauren-Achieved-Success.html>.
(C) Helman,
Christopher. "Why America's Highest Paid CEOs Are Insanely Overpaid."Forbes.
Forbes Magazine, 25 Oct. 2011. Web. 08 Feb. 2013.
<http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2011/10/25/why-americas-highest-paid-ceos-are-insanely-overpaid/>.
(D) "What
Americas Best-Paid CEOs Have In Common: The Exit Door." Corporate
Intelligence RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Feb. 2013. <http://blogs.wsj.com/corporate-intelligence/2013/01/30/what-americas-best-paid-ceos-have-in-common-the-exit-door/>.
(E) "Average Japanese CEO
Earns One-Sixth As Much As American CEOs."ThinkProgress RSS. N.p.,
n.d. Web. 09 Feb. 2013. <http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/07/08/106536/japanese-ceo-american-sixth/?mobile=nc>.
(F) DeCarlo, Scott.
"America's Highest Paid CEOs." Forbes. Forbes Magazine,
04 Apr. 2012. Web. 10 Feb. 2013.
<http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottdecarlo/2012/04/04/americas-highest-paid-ceos/>.
(G) Mallessons Stephen
Jaques. Directions 2012. Mallesons. Mallessons Stephen
Jaques, n.d. Web.
<http://www.mallesons.com/Documents/Directions_2012.pdf>.
This was very well written and really showed how much of a problem there was with CEO's
ReplyDeleteI think they issue that many people have with CEO's is that there has to be value added in relation to their compensation. If a CEO is bringing in great idea, improving functionality, and helping increase profits, than there is some justification in them having a larger salary. However, it has to be balanced out with the needs of the corporation. Some of the best leaders of companies are the ones that do not necessarily do it for the pay.
ReplyDelete